Football discussion

ChelseaQuinsfan wrote:

Anfields5thKing wrote:

ChelseaQuinsfan wrote:

Anfields5thKing wrote:Hilarious.

First of all, we are a MUCH bigger club than Chelsea and always will be. You're in midtable too in case you hadn't looked. 6th through 14th is mid-table. You're not a big club now. You're a mid-sized club with no history and few fans. Roman didn't buy you because you made the CL, he bought you for the location of your stadium which, at the time, was worth billions in redeveloped land. He bought you to move you. You're called "Chelsea" but aren't actually based in Chelsea which is nearly as funny as "Manchester" United.

Your qualification for the CL before Roman was akin to Everton qualifying for the CL.

Secondly, our midfield has NEVER consisted of Spearing, Adam and Shelvey. 3 squad players when everyone is fit. Shelvey's a very talented young player. As is Jordan Henderson. Comical to see anyone who supports a club that paid 14mil for John Obi Mikel a day after he moved for 4million. Alonso and Gerrard were never partners in our midfield. Alonso partnered Hamann, then Sissoko, then Mascherano. Gerrard played right wing or off the striker.

And to talk about comically overpaid players when you pay Ferreira 70k a week is just brilliant.

I'd suggest brushing up your Chelsea history before slagging off another club, but Chelsea don't have any history. Sunderland haven't won a title in nearly 80 years and they've still got two more than you. You have the same amount as Sheffield Wednesday and Newcastle. Neither of whom have won a title in 80 years. Well done. Big club? Not likely.

We might not have a history but at least we have a future, something Liverpool doesn't. No hope of even getting into the Champions league, never mind challenging for the title any time soon. The only thing Liverpool fans live off is their history which is comical because the club has never even won the Premier League and they still try and compare themselves to Man Utd. Most delusional set of supporters out there, right now not even the biggest club in Merseyside.

Glen Johnson get's paid 6.5 million a year. Nuff said really, at least Feirrara was a good player and a good servant to the club.

Glen Johnson is England's first choice right back you daft cunt. Far better than Ferreira ever was. And those wages for Johnson are inaccurate. He's not on close to that. That's the maximum he could earn if he hit all incentives in his contract.

You're not going to be in the Champions League next year either you clown. We've won EVERYTHING more times than you. League titles, FA Cups, League Cups, European Cups, UEFA Cups. EVERYTHING. You've bought some league titles under Roman but no Chelsea team will every be considered a great team. Not like Liverpool of the 70's and 80's, United of the 90's, Arsenal's unbeaten team. Truly great teams built over time who earned their success. We're rebuilding now, that takes time. I know you don't understand that because Chelsea simply bought their success, but proper United fans will understand it. As will fans of other big clubs who've had sustained success, something Chelsea haven't EVER had and will never have. 9 years of Roman's money and you've only managed 3 league titles?? Dear oh dear. All that money spent and not even the most success English team of that period of time?? That must SUCK.

We're by far the biggest club in Merseyside, do you understand what a BIG club is?? Obviously not I suppose considering you support a small time club with no financial stability and a questionable future. What are you going to do when the FFP rules stop Roman from trying to buy success and players stop going to you because you can't afford big wages and big transfer fees because you have NO fanbase, NO global commercial appeal AND no Champions League. What are you going to do when Roman decides he's bored of you and demands his money back from the club? All 500mil that he's loaned the club. Because that's what he's done. He's loaned the money to the club, he hasn't invested it. Chelsea football club are broke with huge losses mounting every year that Roman covers for them. While he continues to lend them money, they'll stay relevant. When he stops, they'll probably cease to exist. Then all their fans can go back to supporting United, Fulham and Millwall


Chelsea are SUCH a big club with SUCH great fans that they can't even sell out their allocation for the FA Cup final. The second time they've failed to do so in recent years. Hilarious. Portsmouth, Stoke, Cardiff. These are clubs who successfully sold out their allocations. Never the actual big clubs that have been to the final since it moved back to Wembley, all of whom have sold their allocations in A DAY. Chelsea didn't sell out their allocation for the semi-final either. Small time club, no fans.

He's only first choice for retards, anyone else can clearly see he is behind Richards and Walker. One of the worst players to play for England in recent times, he's awful. Wasn't better than Feirrara when he was with us and he isn't now, nor will he ever be.

We still have a chance of being in the CL next year, count us out on your own peril. If we don't make it this year, we'll make it next year. You don't have a hope of making it anytime this decade.

You spent ridiculous amounts of money to win nothing and become a mid-table club. 35 million for Carrol, close to 20 Million for Downing and nearly the same for Henderson. Without Gerrard and Suarez you'd really be fighting relegation and even with them you have a weaker team than Everton, Newcastle and Tottenham despite spending all that money. You now have a mid-table squad with about 3 world-class players. Blackburn have won the premier league more times than you, and despite the fact that they are going down this season, that won't change any time soon. Your lucky your thuggish fans threatened the life of your captain otherwise he would have walked a long time ago otherwise that club would have fallen a long time ago. I'm going to love seeing what you are going to do when he finally calls it a day.

manschesthair_utd wrote:dont know why i even watch, its too stressful for me.

watching these football matches is like a tennis match and my heart is the ball.

almost got the credit card declined at the checkout, but in the end the purchase of the premiership title was completed.

Once Mohawked Pete wrote:

manschesthair_utd wrote:dont know why i even watch, its too stressful for me.

watching these football matches is like a tennis match and my heart is the ball.

almost got the credit card declined at the checkout, but in the end the purchase of the premiership title was completed.

They played the best football, and without doubt, had the better players. I honestly think, that had there been a decent manager in charge, they would have won it by April. Curious now, to see whether they persist with Mancini.

p4pnumber_1 wrote:

Once Mohawked Pete wrote:

manschesthair_utd wrote:dont know why i even watch, its too stressful for me.

watching these football matches is like a tennis match and my heart is the ball.

almost got the credit card declined at the checkout, but in the end the purchase of the premiership title was completed.

They played the best football, and without doubt, had the better players. I honestly think, that had there been a decent manager in charge, they would have won it by April. Curious now, to see whether they persist with Mancini.

What an insult it will be if they get rid of him. I personally think he's a great manager, and the board seem to have confidence. I will lose all respect for City if they do get rid.

manschesthair_utd wrote:dont know why i even watch, its too stressful for me.

watching these football matches is like a tennis match and my heart is the ball.

almost got the credit card declined at the checkout, but in the end the purchase of the premiership title was completed.

Once Mohawked Pete wrote:

They played the best football, and without doubt, had the better players. I honestly think, that had there been a decent manager in charge, they would have won it by April. Curious now, to see whether they persist with Mancini.

Anfields5thKing wrote:

Once Mohawked Pete wrote:

They played the best football, and without doubt, had the better players. I honestly think, that had there been a decent manager in charge, they would have won it by April. Curious now, to see whether they persist with Mancini.

Agree on this fully. He'd a mediocre manager and he nearly cost them the title. I think Benitez would be perfect for them to be honest.

They're the best team, with the best squad and they play the best football. They should have had the title wrapped up weeks ago and would have if they had a better manager.

He's safe for next season though, but I'd imagine after 90 minutes knives were being sharpened and phone numbers for Guardiola, Benitez and Mourinho were being sought.